For conversation to be successful it has to be 'mutually' successful. We have all had a one-sided conversation where whoever we are speaking with is not paying attention, distracted or trying to control the flow of energy and information. These sorts of experiences can leave us feeling dissatisfied, incomplete, angry and disrespected among many other negative feelings. Imagine what it might be for a horse to have mostly one-sided conversations with humans because even well-intentioned humans do not understand how to have a conversation with a horse.
Many humans simply do not understand the mind, psychology, language and behavioral tendencies of horses. They feel that they must dominate and control the animal to get what they want from it. This is indeed a sad state of affairs for the horse. Horses always want to communicate with whoever is near them. They are a very social animal and desire to have 'relationships' with those around them. We humans often only show up as the caretaker and boss for our horses. When the boss speaks, it is always a one- sided conversation. Not being 'heard' within a conversation goes along with not being
respected. The person we are having the conversation with doesn't listen to what we are saying or even tries to understand our point of view. This creates frustration, resentment, a collapse of communication and destroys the possibility of a good relationship. If we take a hard look at the failure of our relationships with our horses, I think we would find that our inability to have a simple, successful conversation with them is partially at the core of the problem. We simply do not know how to listen to them and appropriately respond. Nor, do we have to desire to do so much of the time as we want what we want from them and we want it now. We tend to think we need to show up as the boss of the horse rather than a respectful friend and trusted leader. I am not suggesting that our conversations with our equine friends be all sugar coated and honey sweet. This would not be honest or reasonable as some conversations need to contain information about rules, boundaries, procedures and the like. This is serious information that needs to be received in a positive way to be effective and helpful. Both parties having the conversation need to be open and respectfully giving and receiving information.
Being a good conversationalist is somewhat of an art. Whether it is between humans or humans and horses, the same elements need to be present for the exchange to be considered mutually successful. The first important element might be a common language. After all if one person only speaks French and the other only Greek, great success would seem to be difficult to achieve. For horses their main mode of communication is body language. If we are not able or unwilling to read and correctly interpret a horse's body language, we may as well be speaking a foreign language to each other. A successful conversation also has an element of mutual respect within it. If we determine someone is not listening to us, they are showing disrespect. We can feel it and so can the horse when we are not listening to it or paying attention. The conversation quickly becomes an unpleasant and a frustrating experience when this is the case. This one main point is at the root of many problems humans have with their horses. We are not listening to our horses and making a sincere effort to understand what they are trying to say. Mostly a horse is attempting to communicate its fearful feelings or its feelings of safety. We so often seem to ignore their efforts at communication.
My strongest belief is that all behavior we do not want from our horses is the animal trying to communicate it is afraid. If the horse shows resistance to a request (or demand) we tend to judge it as being stubborn and bad. We then tend to 'shout' at the horse by using force and punishment to make it comply with what we want. The mutually successful conversation went out the window. An alternative to this unsuccessful conversation might be to first: be very clear and precise with what we wish to communicate. The more precise and accurate we can be in our communications, the better chance we have of being understood. Not knowing what we want to say makes it very difficult to say it. Horses do not suffer from this sort of inability to be clear and precise with communications as we human can tend to do. Additionally, the horse is not trying to manipulate us as we want to do with it. What the horse is telling us all the time is how it feels in any given moment. But we tend to ignore the horse's conversation to us in deference to our agenda with the horse.
Here is a simple, imaginary successful beginning conversation between a human and a horse. First things are we want to calm ourselves and focus in the present on what we want to achieve. We want to greet the horse (say hello) so we take a step or two towards the horse and then back up a step or two. By backing away a step we actually are showing respect and asking permission to approach the horse for more greeting. Simply walking up to the horse and touching it is disrespectful and can scare a horse. The horse will generally look at us when we back away and may even turn towards us a bit. This is acknowledgement and gratitude for our respect coming from the horse as well as it showing interest in us. Next we might slowly and thoughtfully approach the animal's neck or shoulder, keeping our hands down. Again, this is a respectful way of beginning this conversation. If the animal moves away from us, we should back up a step to assist the horse in understanding we mean it no harm. Compare this to a typical conversation you might see between Greeks or any two people on the street. The conversation is very animated with much gesturing and waving of the hands. The speech is often loud, rapid and one person does not hesitate to speak over the other. To us this is normal. It is definitely not normal for a horse.
Actually I prefer to suggest things to a horse rather than try to tell it what to do. Through suggestions, the horse actually begins to figure out for itself what it is I am trying to communicate. This is always best. Having a successful conversation with a horse means that information and feelings have been exchanged in a positive way. Feelings of safety and trust have been preserved and perhaps even brought to a higher level.
Some peopele say horses think in pictures. I tend to agree with this. It should be obvious to us all that they do, in fact, think in some form or another. If we accept they think in pictures and that horses are emotional animals
(feeling a range of emotions from fear to elation) then the pictures in a horse's mind have an emotional attachment like a file attached to an email. The pictures either feel good or they do not. If we think about it, our thoughts have an emotional content and feelings attached to them as well. Our thoughts can either prompt us to feel good or not. This is why many motivational speakers tell us that if we are having thoughts that do not support us in feeling good, we can choose to change our minds; our minds being the only thing we really can choose to change in this life.
An answer is to better horsemanship, either on the ground or in the saddle, is our willingness to become empathetic with our horses. Humans wanting to improve show performance, or any activity with their horses, need to somehow tune into the emotional lives of their equines and feel what the animal is feeling and then make adjustments accordingly as to how they are training and handling their mounts. I am asked often how to tune into the feelings of horses. The thing I tell people to do first is to have a sincere and honest desire to join with the animal's feelings. The next thing would be for the human to, for a little while at least, let go of their agenda. Being fixated on a big agenda causes humans to have narrow vision and limited ability for being flexible, tolerant and patient. Not being fixated on a specific agenda allows humans to be open and more able to adjust to variations in whatever a particular situation produces. Giving up agenda gives the human a better view of the bigger picture. It removes limitations and blocks to progress and allows more opportunity for success. Giving up our agenda offers a rare glimpse of freedom to the horse and the human. Empathy is a huge key and essential element to successful relationships of all types, including with our beloved horses.
Saturday, January 21, 2012
Monday, January 16, 2012
Mentality Principle
We humans are a collectively insecure lot. We are determined, it seems, to prove that we are not alone when it comes to being smart. We search for intelligence in outer space and here on earth we're desperate to show that many other animals, perhaps all, are just like us, but going about their lives a bit differently.
So important was the horse to Western civilisation in the last two millennia that all European cities are adorned with statues of the horse. The horse fought our wars, it toiled for us; it helped build much of the New World. Nowadays it fulfils our dreams, and still fires our imaginations and inspires wonder in those who occasionally pause to reflect. Horses are not just pleasure vehicles - much is expected of them. A horse may be our best friend, our only friend, our child, our partner or other bizarre roles. So powerful is the horse in the human psyche that Carl Jung, the famous Swiss psychologist believed that the image of a horse evokes our deepest primal drives. The horse has always been a paradox. How could such a big, powerful beast be typically so gentle, so forgiving?
Similarities
In some ways we're not unlike horses. The similarities between horses and humans probably helped to bring us together in the first place. Like us, the horse is a highly social being. That's why horses kept in isolation are more inclined to develop behaviours like windsucking and many other problems compared to group housed horses. Anyone who has witnessed separation anxiety also knows how much friends are important to horses. So strong is the instinct for togetherness that grooming and stroking horses in the area just in front of the withers has evolved to lower heart rates - it strengthens bonds. It's the best place to positively reinforce a horse.
The horse also has an excellent memory although in some respects theirs is much better than ours. While our memory is affected by our recall and reasoning abilities, the memory of the horse is more stable, probably because it is unclouded by reflection. Equine scientists Anja Wolf and Martine Hausberger showed that horses can remember reactions without practise at least for many years, and this probably extends to a lifetime. Thinking, analysing and reflecting however, corrupts memory. We humans are always reflecting on our memories, dragging them up out of storage when we think or tell a story, then afterwards we re-store them again. Only this time they are stored a little differently than before. They may be altered by the contexts in which we reflect (physical, emotional, perceptual aspects of the moments of reflection). On the contrary, the horse only retrieves memories of events and places when it is confronted with the original or similar stimuli. This makes for a much clearer and more accurate memory. Every horse person is aware of the fact that the horse knows if there is something slightly different in its environment. You could say the horse has a photographic memory. Yet most of you wouldn't be able to recall hardly anything of the design of say a ten dollar note, (to the joy of counterfeiters!) despite the fact that you see them constantly. To the detriment of training, the horse remembers far more than you do of what happened where. During schooling you may notice that the horse goes better on one quarter of the circle than elsewhere, and gradually, if what you are doing is right, the good area increases. On the downside, the horse remembers tension and fear better than anything else.
Horses are mammals and so their learning mechanisms are similar to those of humans. Like us they are swift at trial and error learning (learning the right reaction through reward), excellent at classical conditioning (i.e. learning associations, cues or aids) and masters at habituation (getting used to things). They can also learn to generalise to stimuli, (alterations in aids) and they can even learn categories of things (based on similar physical characteristics). However according to one of the most respected researchers in this field, Professor Christine Nicol of Bristol University, experiments indicate that while horses are capable of forming categories of simular characteristics of things "there is no evidence that they can develop abstract concepts". So while there are some mental similarities that horses share with humans, there are also some important differences. Understanding these differences is central to achieving a high level of success with all horses rather than just a few.
Differences
I wanted to investigate ‘understanding' in horses. I wanted to see if the horse had a facility similar to our prefrontal cortex (front of the brain) where it could imagine, ‘see with the mind's eye', where it could ponder on past events or think of the future. I decided to design an experiment that was later published in the journal Applied Animal Behaviour Science. The experimental design utilised the horse's well-known ability to be cued to the delivery of food to either one of two feed goals in a test arena. One by one, each horse was held by a handler in the middle of the arena facing the feed goals. There was a feed goal to the right, and a feed goal to the left, and a person sitting beside each feed goal. The person sitting beside one of the feed goals would stand up and pour feed into the feed goal. The horse would see this and would then be immediately released. Over 40 trials the horses soon learned that when they saw food being poured, that's where the food would be, so they would go to the correct feed bin. But as soon as we separated the pouring of the feed and the release of the horse by ten seconds, the horse's success rate plummeted to 50% - in other words it became random. They couldn't remember where the food was actually being poured after ten seconds. While individual horses occasionally seemed as if they could manage the ten seconds, again their results would drop. Statistical analysis showed that horses collectively or individually could not recall the correct goal in a two choice situation where each goal was equally rewarded. Interesting things happened to when the horse's discovered they had failed. A couple of ponies and warmbloods would lay their ears back and make a bee-line for the correct goal, while some thoroughbreds decided to give up altogether and leave. To account for the results, some researchers suggested that the amount of food (100 grams oats) for each trial was insufficient to motivate the horse horses. However this can easily be discounted because the same amount of food powerfully motivated the horses in the immediate release trials.
The experiment reminds us that correct timing in training is essential, that unlike us, there is no stream of consciousness that accompanies instinctive behaviours and that there are differences in short-term memory in horses compared to humans. It means that we must keep training as simple as possible to be sure it is digestible and to be sure our training methods are not so difficult that only a handful of horses succeed. Sometimes the complexity of our training suggests that we are always inclined to over-estimate mental abilities in horses.
Observational learning of novel behaviour (copying a novel act) has long been considered to be indicative of some abilities of reasoning. If you think about it, it's not hard to guess why this is so. Observational learning requires an animal to see and remember the behaviour sequence, see themselves perform it in their mind and then perform it. Notice that I say ‘novel act' - that's important because there is a phenomenon in all animals where they are able to copy a behaviour that is already ‘wired' into their brains. This contagious mimicking of instinctive behaviour is adaptive. So when one animal eats, others are compelled to do so, when one lies down others may do also. For social animals synchronising behaviour is sensible. Contagious behaviour is not learned but is more of an instinctive triggering device. Like when you see someone yawn you are inclined to yawn too. Horse people often believe that wind-sucking is copied. As Dr Paul McGreevy points out, this is not correct. Observational learning in horses has been thoroughly researched in horses and all published experimental investigations have yielded negative results. Unlike cooperative predators, horses are also slow to learn ‘rules' that govern where food might be found if food is switched from one place to another. Unlike Chimps, gorillas and dolphins they cannot recognise themselves in a mirror - they only see another horse. They are also poor at seeing a detour to a goal if the opening requires going further away from the goal first. Once they've achieved it though, they are quick to remember the path. Horses are unable to do these things because these abilities were not required in the millions of years of the evolution of their behaviours on the open grasslands.
Equine researchers agree that any higher mental processing abilities in the horse are, if present at all, poorly developed. On the other hand, greater reasoning abilities are seen in predators, and are most highly developed in co-operative predators with diverse diets such as chimps and dolphins. Dogs rate highly, according to some researchers. Even birds that face challenges in food procurement (seed, fruit and carrion eating birds and also fruit bats) might also rate as having some development of higher mental abilities. Such animals have to remember the location and amount of remaining food to save energy on wasted foraging journeys. Of course, if you think about it why would horses need reasoning abilities? You need a great memory to be a grazer but no deductive powers. As Stephen Budiansky points out, grass unlike mice, doesn't hide. Such powers require extra brain tissue which, as Dr T.W. Deacon showed in 1990, is ten times more expensive energy-wise (huge requirements for glucose and oxygen) than any other tissue in the body.
What people erroneously consider to be examples of reasoning in their horse generally turn out to be excellent examples of trial and error learning. The pony that fiddles with the gate latch and learns to open it is a typical example. It's clever, but it isn't reasoning. It's the same process by which horses learn equitation. Horses learn to avoid pressure form the reins and legs by giving a correct response that was initially learned by trial and error. Then they learn associated cues such as seat and weight aids.
Why do these differences matter?
That the horse is not a reasoning creature matters a great deal. Overestimating an animal's mental ability leads to all sorts of assumptions that have bad consequences for horses. That the horse doesn't reason means he is an entirely innocent partner in the training process. The horse cannot be blamed for misdemeanours or poor performance - these are due largely riding or training (or health) problems. When a horse behaves in ways that don't suit us it is wrong to say "He knows what he did wrong" or "He understands". There is no understanding in the horse - he simply reacts to situations, events, aids etc. His behaviour at any one time is a snapshot into the sum total of all his training. If he behaves badly at an event compared to home it means one of two things - either he is not established in his work at home or else his work at home is flawed with at least some confusions. Tension is a good indicator. Does he grind his teeth because he is working hard, really ‘putting in' or because he is a little confused - perhaps there are conflicting aids or too many aids on at once.... We owe it to our horses to consider all these matters.
Therefore......
It makes the world of difference to know that our best chance of getting through to horses in training is to keep everything as simple as possible. That's what makes trainers like Kyra Kyrklund so inspiring. Her training scheme embraces a correct interpretation of learning theory as well as simplicity. It is certainly possible to train horses to the highest levels yet keeping true to correct learning theory. For welfare reasons I believe that such principles should be taught at every level of instruction, from pony club to the training of coaches throughout the world in all disciplines.
If the horse ‘understood' his training then maybe we wouldn't need to be so simplistic, so consistent, so precise. On the other hand if he were so smart as to be able to comprehend training, then perhaps he would not be so rideable. Maybe it would be unethical to ride horses if they were capable of reflection, because then they would be suffering, given that they would rather eat grass and be with friends.... But the horse is unstressed by good habits whether they are under-saddle or wherever. Furthermore I believe that correct horsemanship is equivalent to behavioural and environmental enrichment, since it is part of the horse's ethogram to experience many more stimuli and environments than he would normally encounter in a small paddock or worse still, a box-stall. However, bad habits, inconsistency and confusion have very negative welfare implications for horses.
Mankind's responsibility to horses
Because the horse is an innocent partner in equitation, we have a special responsibility there. As time passes and the material needs of the developed world are fewer, more thought is devoted to welfare and ethical issues. Short necks, tension and conflict behaviours can no longer be brushed off as the horse's fault or personality. Judges need to clear and certain about signs of tension. The signs of tension need reviewing and predetermined penalties ought to be issued for the various signs and levels of tension. Judges should recognise that they are ultimately custodians of the performance horse because the rewards they issue give direction to horse sports. They should have clear perceptions about how they might judge a flash moving but tense horse as opposed to a more average moving ‘happy' one. Otherwise the sport of dressage becomes more of a meat market than a competition of training.
Our greatest responsibility is never forgetting that the horse's welfare is paramount. Every horse trainer should always have an open mind about possible limitations and confusions in their training. Like all sports and performing arts, egos can get in the way, and ways of understanding can be severely hampered by closed mindsets. But when it comes to doing sports that involve animals, egos should count for nothing. It is a privilege to ride horses and remarkable that nature has evolved the possibility. Not for one moment should that be forgotten.
So important was the horse to Western civilisation in the last two millennia that all European cities are adorned with statues of the horse. The horse fought our wars, it toiled for us; it helped build much of the New World. Nowadays it fulfils our dreams, and still fires our imaginations and inspires wonder in those who occasionally pause to reflect. Horses are not just pleasure vehicles - much is expected of them. A horse may be our best friend, our only friend, our child, our partner or other bizarre roles. So powerful is the horse in the human psyche that Carl Jung, the famous Swiss psychologist believed that the image of a horse evokes our deepest primal drives. The horse has always been a paradox. How could such a big, powerful beast be typically so gentle, so forgiving?
Similarities
In some ways we're not unlike horses. The similarities between horses and humans probably helped to bring us together in the first place. Like us, the horse is a highly social being. That's why horses kept in isolation are more inclined to develop behaviours like windsucking and many other problems compared to group housed horses. Anyone who has witnessed separation anxiety also knows how much friends are important to horses. So strong is the instinct for togetherness that grooming and stroking horses in the area just in front of the withers has evolved to lower heart rates - it strengthens bonds. It's the best place to positively reinforce a horse.
The horse also has an excellent memory although in some respects theirs is much better than ours. While our memory is affected by our recall and reasoning abilities, the memory of the horse is more stable, probably because it is unclouded by reflection. Equine scientists Anja Wolf and Martine Hausberger showed that horses can remember reactions without practise at least for many years, and this probably extends to a lifetime. Thinking, analysing and reflecting however, corrupts memory. We humans are always reflecting on our memories, dragging them up out of storage when we think or tell a story, then afterwards we re-store them again. Only this time they are stored a little differently than before. They may be altered by the contexts in which we reflect (physical, emotional, perceptual aspects of the moments of reflection). On the contrary, the horse only retrieves memories of events and places when it is confronted with the original or similar stimuli. This makes for a much clearer and more accurate memory. Every horse person is aware of the fact that the horse knows if there is something slightly different in its environment. You could say the horse has a photographic memory. Yet most of you wouldn't be able to recall hardly anything of the design of say a ten dollar note, (to the joy of counterfeiters!) despite the fact that you see them constantly. To the detriment of training, the horse remembers far more than you do of what happened where. During schooling you may notice that the horse goes better on one quarter of the circle than elsewhere, and gradually, if what you are doing is right, the good area increases. On the downside, the horse remembers tension and fear better than anything else.
Horses are mammals and so their learning mechanisms are similar to those of humans. Like us they are swift at trial and error learning (learning the right reaction through reward), excellent at classical conditioning (i.e. learning associations, cues or aids) and masters at habituation (getting used to things). They can also learn to generalise to stimuli, (alterations in aids) and they can even learn categories of things (based on similar physical characteristics). However according to one of the most respected researchers in this field, Professor Christine Nicol of Bristol University, experiments indicate that while horses are capable of forming categories of simular characteristics of things "there is no evidence that they can develop abstract concepts". So while there are some mental similarities that horses share with humans, there are also some important differences. Understanding these differences is central to achieving a high level of success with all horses rather than just a few.
Differences
I wanted to investigate ‘understanding' in horses. I wanted to see if the horse had a facility similar to our prefrontal cortex (front of the brain) where it could imagine, ‘see with the mind's eye', where it could ponder on past events or think of the future. I decided to design an experiment that was later published in the journal Applied Animal Behaviour Science. The experimental design utilised the horse's well-known ability to be cued to the delivery of food to either one of two feed goals in a test arena. One by one, each horse was held by a handler in the middle of the arena facing the feed goals. There was a feed goal to the right, and a feed goal to the left, and a person sitting beside each feed goal. The person sitting beside one of the feed goals would stand up and pour feed into the feed goal. The horse would see this and would then be immediately released. Over 40 trials the horses soon learned that when they saw food being poured, that's where the food would be, so they would go to the correct feed bin. But as soon as we separated the pouring of the feed and the release of the horse by ten seconds, the horse's success rate plummeted to 50% - in other words it became random. They couldn't remember where the food was actually being poured after ten seconds. While individual horses occasionally seemed as if they could manage the ten seconds, again their results would drop. Statistical analysis showed that horses collectively or individually could not recall the correct goal in a two choice situation where each goal was equally rewarded. Interesting things happened to when the horse's discovered they had failed. A couple of ponies and warmbloods would lay their ears back and make a bee-line for the correct goal, while some thoroughbreds decided to give up altogether and leave. To account for the results, some researchers suggested that the amount of food (100 grams oats) for each trial was insufficient to motivate the horse horses. However this can easily be discounted because the same amount of food powerfully motivated the horses in the immediate release trials.
The experiment reminds us that correct timing in training is essential, that unlike us, there is no stream of consciousness that accompanies instinctive behaviours and that there are differences in short-term memory in horses compared to humans. It means that we must keep training as simple as possible to be sure it is digestible and to be sure our training methods are not so difficult that only a handful of horses succeed. Sometimes the complexity of our training suggests that we are always inclined to over-estimate mental abilities in horses.
Observational learning of novel behaviour (copying a novel act) has long been considered to be indicative of some abilities of reasoning. If you think about it, it's not hard to guess why this is so. Observational learning requires an animal to see and remember the behaviour sequence, see themselves perform it in their mind and then perform it. Notice that I say ‘novel act' - that's important because there is a phenomenon in all animals where they are able to copy a behaviour that is already ‘wired' into their brains. This contagious mimicking of instinctive behaviour is adaptive. So when one animal eats, others are compelled to do so, when one lies down others may do also. For social animals synchronising behaviour is sensible. Contagious behaviour is not learned but is more of an instinctive triggering device. Like when you see someone yawn you are inclined to yawn too. Horse people often believe that wind-sucking is copied. As Dr Paul McGreevy points out, this is not correct. Observational learning in horses has been thoroughly researched in horses and all published experimental investigations have yielded negative results. Unlike cooperative predators, horses are also slow to learn ‘rules' that govern where food might be found if food is switched from one place to another. Unlike Chimps, gorillas and dolphins they cannot recognise themselves in a mirror - they only see another horse. They are also poor at seeing a detour to a goal if the opening requires going further away from the goal first. Once they've achieved it though, they are quick to remember the path. Horses are unable to do these things because these abilities were not required in the millions of years of the evolution of their behaviours on the open grasslands.
Equine researchers agree that any higher mental processing abilities in the horse are, if present at all, poorly developed. On the other hand, greater reasoning abilities are seen in predators, and are most highly developed in co-operative predators with diverse diets such as chimps and dolphins. Dogs rate highly, according to some researchers. Even birds that face challenges in food procurement (seed, fruit and carrion eating birds and also fruit bats) might also rate as having some development of higher mental abilities. Such animals have to remember the location and amount of remaining food to save energy on wasted foraging journeys. Of course, if you think about it why would horses need reasoning abilities? You need a great memory to be a grazer but no deductive powers. As Stephen Budiansky points out, grass unlike mice, doesn't hide. Such powers require extra brain tissue which, as Dr T.W. Deacon showed in 1990, is ten times more expensive energy-wise (huge requirements for glucose and oxygen) than any other tissue in the body.
What people erroneously consider to be examples of reasoning in their horse generally turn out to be excellent examples of trial and error learning. The pony that fiddles with the gate latch and learns to open it is a typical example. It's clever, but it isn't reasoning. It's the same process by which horses learn equitation. Horses learn to avoid pressure form the reins and legs by giving a correct response that was initially learned by trial and error. Then they learn associated cues such as seat and weight aids.
Why do these differences matter?
That the horse is not a reasoning creature matters a great deal. Overestimating an animal's mental ability leads to all sorts of assumptions that have bad consequences for horses. That the horse doesn't reason means he is an entirely innocent partner in the training process. The horse cannot be blamed for misdemeanours or poor performance - these are due largely riding or training (or health) problems. When a horse behaves in ways that don't suit us it is wrong to say "He knows what he did wrong" or "He understands". There is no understanding in the horse - he simply reacts to situations, events, aids etc. His behaviour at any one time is a snapshot into the sum total of all his training. If he behaves badly at an event compared to home it means one of two things - either he is not established in his work at home or else his work at home is flawed with at least some confusions. Tension is a good indicator. Does he grind his teeth because he is working hard, really ‘putting in' or because he is a little confused - perhaps there are conflicting aids or too many aids on at once.... We owe it to our horses to consider all these matters.
Therefore......
It makes the world of difference to know that our best chance of getting through to horses in training is to keep everything as simple as possible. That's what makes trainers like Kyra Kyrklund so inspiring. Her training scheme embraces a correct interpretation of learning theory as well as simplicity. It is certainly possible to train horses to the highest levels yet keeping true to correct learning theory. For welfare reasons I believe that such principles should be taught at every level of instruction, from pony club to the training of coaches throughout the world in all disciplines.
If the horse ‘understood' his training then maybe we wouldn't need to be so simplistic, so consistent, so precise. On the other hand if he were so smart as to be able to comprehend training, then perhaps he would not be so rideable. Maybe it would be unethical to ride horses if they were capable of reflection, because then they would be suffering, given that they would rather eat grass and be with friends.... But the horse is unstressed by good habits whether they are under-saddle or wherever. Furthermore I believe that correct horsemanship is equivalent to behavioural and environmental enrichment, since it is part of the horse's ethogram to experience many more stimuli and environments than he would normally encounter in a small paddock or worse still, a box-stall. However, bad habits, inconsistency and confusion have very negative welfare implications for horses.
Mankind's responsibility to horses
Because the horse is an innocent partner in equitation, we have a special responsibility there. As time passes and the material needs of the developed world are fewer, more thought is devoted to welfare and ethical issues. Short necks, tension and conflict behaviours can no longer be brushed off as the horse's fault or personality. Judges need to clear and certain about signs of tension. The signs of tension need reviewing and predetermined penalties ought to be issued for the various signs and levels of tension. Judges should recognise that they are ultimately custodians of the performance horse because the rewards they issue give direction to horse sports. They should have clear perceptions about how they might judge a flash moving but tense horse as opposed to a more average moving ‘happy' one. Otherwise the sport of dressage becomes more of a meat market than a competition of training.
Our greatest responsibility is never forgetting that the horse's welfare is paramount. Every horse trainer should always have an open mind about possible limitations and confusions in their training. Like all sports and performing arts, egos can get in the way, and ways of understanding can be severely hampered by closed mindsets. But when it comes to doing sports that involve animals, egos should count for nothing. It is a privilege to ride horses and remarkable that nature has evolved the possibility. Not for one moment should that be forgotten.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)